A counterargument is simply a perspective that refutes your main argument for those of you unfamiliar with the term. In other words, if you’re arguing that technology does more good than damage, the counterargument is the fact that technology does more harm than good.
Before we glance at an illustration, you can find two things I’d choose to mention: first, we cannot stress essential transitions have been in composing effective counterarguments. It very difficult – if not impossible – to distinguish between which ideas you agree with and which ideas you disagree with without them, your reader will have no way of following your train of thought and will find.
Another key factor of good counterarguments may be the concession – that is, the acknowledgement that some areas of the argument that is opposing legitimate. This is actually the many unfamiliar facet of counterarguments for all students – is not your whole point of the counterargument to “disprove” the argument that is opposing?
Eventually, yes, the aim is to show why your argument wins away. Having said that, the purpose of the concession would be to prove that you’ve considered a concern very very carefully, in a way that is nuanced compared to straightforward black/white, good/bad terms. When presented obviously, this kind of consideration really strengthens your argument.
You can make use of this template that is general develop a counterargument:
According to attitude x, _______________________. On one side,
-it holds true best paper writing services that _______________________.
-this claim has many merit because _______________________.
-the declare that _______________________ has some legitimacy.
In the other hand,
-this perspective does not give consideration to that _______________________.
-this claim overlooks the truth that _______________________.
Let’s observe how this will play away in a test paragraph that runs on the example that is personal, those are nevertheless fine). It does not make use of the template exactly, but it’s pretty close.
Once again, we’re planning to make use of the sample prompt released by the ACT. For the intended purpose of this exercise, we’re just planning to view one of many perspectives; attempting to make use of significantly more than that might be too confusing. In reality, you really need to generally avoid integrating a lot more than one outside perspective per paragraph, until you are a stellar journalist that is currently confident with this sort of back-and-forth.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is generally speaking seen as a indication of progress, but just what is lost once we exchange people with devices? Offered the accelerating variety and presence of smart devices, it really is well well well worth examining the implications and definitions of these existence in our everyday lives.
Attitude 1: that which we lose utilizing the replacement of men and women with devices is some element of our mankind. Even our mundane encounters no longer require from us respect, courtesy, and threshold for others.
Thesis: Technology must certanly be regarded as a force once and for all given that it produces brand new opportunities for folks in addition to a more society that is prosperous.
1) Topic sentence: introduce your argument (1 phrase)
Within the last few years, brand brand new types of technology have actually produced methods for individuals talk to one another more easily and quickly than in the past.
2) Elaborate on your own argument, and offer an example that is specific sentences)
From Skype to iphones apps to Twitter, technology erases boundaries, enabling us to speak to individuals halfway around the globe just as if these people were in the next space. I’ve physically benefitted extremely from the technologies: my loved ones immigrated towards the united states of america from Asia when I ended up being 6 years of age, and in the last ten years, collecting round the computer to speak to my grand-parents and my aunt in Beijing became a regular ritual. As we did when I was little, I am nevertheless grateful to be able to see their faces and keep them updated on the details of my daily life – something that would be impossible without “smart” machines although I am sorry that we no longer live next door to them.
3) Introduce outside perspective: 1-2 sentences
Perhaps not every person is really so thinking about the results of the latest technologies, but. Attitude 1 provides a complaint that is typical specifically that the replacement of men and women with devices “causes us to get rid of some section of our mankind.”
4) Acknowledge that the viewpoint is not completely incorrect, and explain why (2-3 sentences)
On one side, this issue comes with some merit. Walking across the street or sitting from the subway, i’m frequently struck by the sheer amount of people staring glassy-eyed in their phones. They generally are incredibly busy texting they almost bump into other people, showing an obvious not enough courtesy and threshold (notice exactly how this declaration weaves the standpoint obviously in to the writer’s argument) .
5) change back once again to your argument and reaffirm it (3-4 sentences)
Having said that, however, the advantages of technology far outweigh a periodic unpleasant sidewalk encounter – at least from my perspeective. As opposed to separate me personally through the global world(notice just exactly how this declaration indirectly refutes the counterargument) , “smart” technology has offered mainly to facilitate my relationships with other people, to not change them.
How exactly to write the ACT that is new essay pt. 2: presenting and discussing viewpoints that are supporting
After supplying a synopsis for the brand brand brand new ACT essay plus some feasible methods to it in my own past post , i wish to now discuss one specific – and essential – skill taking part in composing it: integrating other perspectives into your very very very own argument for help.
You probably have some experience integrating the ideas of people you agree with into your writing if you’ve ever written a research paper. (and when you have actuallyn’t, you’ll get an introduction to doing this on this page.) Having said that, we discover that most high schools do maybe maybe not clearly show pupils to weave supporting quotations, a few ideas, etc. fluidly within their writing. The quotes is there, but they’re often integrated awkwardly in to the bigger argument.
Frequently, pupils assume because they seem so self-explanatory that they do not really need to spend time introducing or explaining their quotes. They’re here to aid the argument, and then the point of the quotation is obvious…right if the argument is clear? Well, not necessarily.
The difficulty is writing that is analytical a lot more explanation than may appear necessary. In general, individuals write on subjects with that they are familiar. They are often unaware of the gaps in other people’s understanding because they know a lot of about their topics. As being outcome, it just will not happen to them just just how explicit they have to be, in addition they find yourself unintentionally making out information this is certainly essential to understanding their way of thinking.
Once you explain a concept – any concept – on paper, you have to bring your reader by the hand, as we say, and lead them through each step of the process of one’s thinking procedure in order that they aren’t getting lost. Presenting other people’s terms or some ideas in a way that produces clear the connection betwixt your argument and theirs is really a key element of that procedure. Otherwise, it is just like you’ve missed ahead a steps that are few making your reader to end and attempt assembled the pieces. If there’s one thing you don’t wish to accomplish to your audience, it’s make your opinions difficult to follow. That is true of college, the ACT, and just about every other writing you may do for the following sixty or seventy years.
Yet again, we’re planning to make use of the sample prompt released by the ACT.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is typically considered to be a indication of progress, but exactly what is lost once we exchange people with devices? Because of the accelerating variety and existence of smart devices, it really is well well worth examining the implications and meanings of the existence within our life.
Attitude 1: everything we lose because of the replacement of men and women with machines is some right section of our humanity. Also our encounters that are mundane longer require from us respect, courtesy, and tolerance for others.
Perspective 2: devices are great at low ability, repeated, jobs, and also at high rate, exceptionally exact jobs. Both in situations, they have been a lot better than humans. This effectiveness contributes to a far more successful and modern globe for everyone else.
Perspective 3: smart devices challenge our idea that is longstanding of people are and will be. This might be good since it pushes people and machines toward brand brand brand new opportunities.